Casebound runs your practice — matters, drafting, billing, and compliance on one data model, with the ethics rules enforced by the database instead of your memory.
This draft cannot reach the client until an attorney disposition is recorded. Not "shouldn't." Cannot.
Demand, conversion, production, delivery, economics. Production eats the rest — and the tools don't help each other.
Your practice management system knows the matter but not what the documents say. Your AI tool drafts but doesn't know the client, the fee posture, or the deadline. Compliance lives in a spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet lives on your discipline at 11pm.
The result is re-keying, shadow systems, and judgment time lost to administration.
Practice management, documents, drafting, billing, and compliance aren't integrated — they're the same system. The safety guarantees are only possible when everything lives together: you can't block an invoice that contradicts the fee agreement when billing lives in another product.
Integration is what makes ethics structural instead of aspirational.
The bench inside Casebound is called Lexwright. It works from your precedents with full matter context. It makes; it never releases.
Every draft records which model wrote it, from which precedents and sources, under which prompt — and what you decided about it. Accepted, edited, rejected, and why. Your corrections make the next draft better. Your file can answer questions before they're asked.
No autonomous actions. No advice to your clients. No exceptions — because it's enforced as data, not policy.
Ask a lawyer why she left solo practice for a 250-lawyer firm and you'll hear the same answer: the difference in resources.
The technology. The precedent bank. The staff. Someone down the hall.
Casebound exists to close that gap. The drafting leverage of an associate pool. A precedent bank that remembers every matter you've run — how you did it last time, as data, not as a memory. Infrastructure that big firms build with millions and you get with a login.
Solo, not small.
Casebound isn't built from customer interviews. It runs a real California practice every working day.
Intake to engagement to drafting to invoice to closing letter. Nothing ships until it has billed a real matter in a real firm with a real bar number on the line.
When we say the gates hold, we mean they've held on us.
Casebound makes one kind of claim: mechanisms, not outcomes. Every promise on this page is a database constraint you can watch refuse to break. The AI never acts alone — every output carries provenance and waits for your recorded disposition before it can reach a client.
Your tenant's data is isolated at the database layer, encrypted at rest, and AI context is assembled only from the matter at hand. It goes to exactly one approved AI provider, and nowhere else.
Casebound records trust obligations as facts and keeps trust rails and operating rails physically separate. It will never take a payment into trust, and it does no ledger math — your bank reconciliation stays authoritative.
Flat, hourly, subscription, capped — fee arrangements are first-class, and invoices are generated from them, not from a template you fight.
Casebound is opening to a small number of solo and small-firm design partners. Bring one real matter type — we'll show you it running end-to-end.
Prefer email? ian@daily.legal